It’s important to note that negligence per se can be used against you as the plaintiff as well. Different jurisdictions define negligence per se in slightly different ways, but it generally applies in situations in which, while causing the underlying accident, the defendant violated a law. For example, it’s against the law to drink and drive while impaired. Negligence per se is very often found in DUI cases. The intent of the law is to prevent the injury or death of a member of the public who lacks health insurance or the ability to pay for emergency care. In some jurisdictions, negligence per se creates merely a rebuttable presumption of negligence. Negligence per se involves the commission of a negligent act that violates the law. Both Kevin and David can state a claim against Peter for their damages as a result of Peter's negligence in driving over the speed limit. Negligence per se essentially eliminates the need to prove the “duty” and “breach” of such duty as you would need to prove in a negligence claim. In ordinary negligence cases, a plaintiff who has suffered personal injury must prove the negligent acts or conducts of the defendant. Negligence per se is a legal doctrine which is applied to situations in which the violation of a law is deemed an automatically negligent act. The question is not whether the driver fell short of the duty of care but rather whether the violation of the law caused damages to the plaintiff. While installing the flu for the fireplace on the first floor of a two-story house, he finds that one of the roof joists is in the way. Variations on Negligence Per Se A few states follow variations on negligence per se. Let’s look at the elements to prove in a workplace injury case: In nearly all jurisdictions, highway safety laws and regulations are designed to protect the safety of children, pedestrians, passengers or others. According to section 545.420 of the Texas transportation code, drivers are prohibited from participating in: A race. According to Restatement (Third) of Torts §14, an actor is negligent per se if she violates a statute that is designed to protect against the type of accident or harm caused by her conduct, and the plaintiff is someone the statute is designed to protect. Sample Negligence Complaint: How to File a Negligence Lawsuit. Laws designating speed limits exist for several reasons. When the law makes an inference of negligence, we say that there is “negligence per se”. For example, a plaintiff in a car accident case may argue negligence per se by claiming that the defendant was speeding at the time of the accident and caused a rear-end accident since speed limits are intended to foster safe driving and prevent auto accidents. While he may not have broken the law, his behavior was contrary to that of a reasonable person. They are designed to prevent bodily injury or some other type of harm, and that intent is usually stated within the text of the law itself. However, another type of claim, negligence per se, depends on … What would have a reasonable person done in the same circumstances? It may be suggested that the confusion found in the Virginia cases is due, in part, to (1) the court's traditional technique in considering legal cause (i.e., "proxi- mate cause") as a part of the concept of negligence… In a negligence case, the plaintiff has a much more difficult burden of proof whereas in a negligence per se action, the law makes it easier for the plaintiff to get compensation. I'm a lawyer by trade and an entrepreneur by spirit. I'm passionate about law, business, marketing and technology. A common example would be a Texas driver striking a pedestrian while driving over the speed limit. Negligence Per Se. How Long Will It Take To Settle Your Personal Injury Case? The information provided on this site is not legal advice, does not constitute a lawyer referral service, and no attorney-client or confidential relationship is or will be formed by use of the site. What is An Example of a Negligence Per Se Car Accident Claim?. In some jurisdictions, negligence per se creates merely a rebuttable presumption of negligence. To defend against a negligence per se claim, the defendant will need to establish that: However, there are some possible defenses against negligence per se claims. that the intent of the law was the prevention of the injury that ended up occurring, and. Another common incidence of such findings is dog bite cases. NEGLIGENCE PER SE AND THE MOTOR VEHICLE CODE 17 consequences whatever. the plaintiff must demonstrate how a reasonable person would have acted in the circumstances and how the defendant failed to act as such. Negligence per se more or less eliminates the "duty" and "breach" aspects of a negligence claim. A good example to help you understand what negligence per se includes the following hypothetical about a car wreck with allegations of drunk driving on a California interstate. The evidence presented in a negligence per se case is principally centred around the defendant’s violation of the law or statute. A car breaking the speed limit and injuring a pedestrian would be negligence per se. What are some negligence per se examples to see how it works in action? By speeding, the driver is breaking a safety-related law designed to protect people like pedestrians from the type of accident that occurred. Peter is liable under the theory of negligence per se … In other words, there is no need to demonstrate how the defendant's conduct was careless if you are relying on negligence per se. The negligence per se doctrine makes it easier for the plaintiff to prove the defendant’s negligence in court. The negligence per se doctrine makes it easier for a plaintiff to get compensation. As a result, if an employee is injured on the job, the employer may be held liable for the damages regardless of how it exercised its duty of care towards the employee. 'Negligence per se' is the term used to describe one of the two doctrines associated with the latter process. In some states, the negligence per se creates a rebuttable presumption of negligence. Enjoy! The house then collapses, injuring somebody. A typical example is one in which a contractor violates a building code when constructing a house. If the law was violated, the discussion moves to whether the violation was the proximate cause of your damages (injuries and other losses). Based on the res ipsa loquitur doctrine, a judge can infer that a defendant was negligent if the facts show that there was an accident and the defendant’s conduct represented the only logical explanation. In areas where the safety and security of individuals are important, you’ll see the application of the per se negligence doctrine apply. If you believe you were injured as a result of someone else's violation of the law, your best next step might be to contact an experienced personal injury attorney to discuss your case and your best strategy for getting a positive result. The negligence per se theory follows the strict liability legal theory whereby a person is held liable for the consequences of certain actions, activity or conduct even in the absence of a provable fault. How is this legal theory different from ordinary “negligence”? NEGLIGENCE PER SE IRAC- Example In determining if a Party A is negligent, the court could establish negligence through common law or through a claim of negligence per se. Maryland Personal Injury Lawyers. Negligence Per Se – An Example For example, let’s assume that a bar serves a minor too much alcohol, and the minor gets in a car, and injures someone else. Most laws providing for a negligence per se claim are clear in their intent. When dealing with a “negligence” matter, you must demonstrate that the actions of the defendant deviated from those of a prudent and reasonable person in the same circumstances causing damages. However, the defendant can rebut that presumption in order to escape liability. Breaching the standard of care is doing something that a reasonably careful person would not have done in the same circumstances. Negligence per se means negligence in and of itself. An example would be the DUI laws in Texas. A car accident results in the death of all the passengers and no witnesses were present on the scene. According to Cornell Law School’s Legal Information Institute, negligence per se is defined as: What is notable with this definition is that negligence per se is a concept that says an act, in of itself, is negligent, regardless of the reasonableness or prudence of the defendant’s conduct. This is another situation where negligence per se will apply; the contractor's negligence can be shown by establishing the building code violation. Since negligence per se involves the blatant violation of a safety regulation, it's a more serious offense.Ordinary NegligenceTo understand negligence per se, we must first… Negligence per se examples can be found in all kinds of situations where statutes and regulations are at play. A typical example is one in which a contractor violates a building code when constructing a house. Read on to learn more about negligence per se and how it might come into play in a personal injury lawsuit. A contractor does not build a property in accordance with the code resulting in personal injury to the plaintiff following its collapse. Helen buys the toaster and due to a product defect, the toaster catches fire injuring Helen. In many jurisdictions, by the mere fact that a person violates a statute, regulation, law or ordinance, and another person is injured or is harmed, the person’s actions will be deemed to have been negligent. Either the law was violated or it wasn't. negligence per se: (purr say) n. negligence due to the violation of a public duty, such as high speed driving. To prove “negligence”, you must demonstrate four basic elements: On the flip side, to prove negligence per se, you must prove four elements (but slightly different than for ordinary negligence): Res ipsa loquitur is a legal theory or doctrine in personal injury cases allowing a plaintiff to prove the defendant’s negligence using circumstantial evidence instead of the violation of the law. When dealing with negligence per se, you no longer need to prove that the defendant’s conduct fell short of the applicable standard of care. In negligence per se cases, the prudence or reasonableness of the defendant’s actions does not matter. In the states that follow the negligence per se rules, the reasonableness of the defendant’s actions will not excuse the defendant from being held liable by the court for the injuries caused to the plaintiff. DUI laws are designed to discourage people from driving under the influence of alcohol or drugs to avoid DUI accidents. However, another type of claim, negligence per se, depends on a violation of the law. The state of Texas has certain laws that are designed to prevent harm and protect the public. (See: negligence , per se ) Violation of a Vehicle Code section meeting the elements of negligence per se becomes conclusive evidence of duty and breach unless rebutted. For example, driving laws may specify that exceeding a certain rate of speed is legally negligent. “Negligence per se” is a fault concept (typically applied in personal injury cases) making it easier for the plaintiff to get compensation for damages suffered. That is, the standard of care is set by the statute rather than a “reasonable person” standard or professional standard. We will look at what is negligence per se, compare negligence per se vs negligence, compare res ipsa loquitur and negligence per se, look at the elements you need to prove in court, the standard of care, examples and more. Also, it must be proved that the defendant’s conduct was the actual and proximate cause of the injuries suffered. Examples of Negligence Per Se. Statutory violation is central in negligence per se claims is to prove that the defendant violated the law. In some states, the information on this website may be considered a lawyer referral service. When a driver faces a lawsuit, the claim against him is typically based on a theory of ordinary negligence. Hello Nation! Free Consultation (800) 553-8082 Miller & Zois helps injured victims and their families in personal injury, medical malpractice and wrongful death cases. (Learn whether a drunk driver is always at fault for a car accident.). In this example, the ER doctor may be liable for negligence per se and could face a lawsuit for medical malpractice. Typical examples of driver behavior that may be considered negligence per se include: Street racing. The end result for both a negligence claim and a negligence per se claim is for the plaintiff to get compensation for injuries suffered to the actions of the defendant. The standard jury instructions state that violation of a public safety statute like the prohibition against drunk driving “is evidence of negligence. However, with the negligence per se doctrine, the law creates an ‘evidence’ shortcut whereby the plaintiff does not need to prove that the defendant’s conduct observed or not the standard of care. Once the statutory violation is proved, the plaintiff will only have to prove that he or she was a member of the class of people the law was intending to protect and that he or she suffered damages the law was trying to avoid. What is an example of negligence per se? Someone who is harmed as a direct result of the violation of a law which is intended to protect members of the general public from harm can bring suit on the grounds of negligence per se. In negligence per se lawsuits, the evidence is centred around the violation of the law. Strict liability is particularly used in product liability cases or other dangerous activities. The construction of a property, house, building or other structures is typically governed by building codes imposing legal obligations on the contractors to ensure the property is safe for its occupants. Example of Per Se Negligence. Your use of this website constitutes acceptance of the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms, Privacy Policy and Cookie Policy. To prove negligence per se, you must prove the following four elements: A negligence per se can be brought as a standalone claim or “cause of action” in cases like personal injury lawsuits or can be brought as an argument within a standard negligence action. In this instance, the law provides for … Here is a negligence per se example: Company ABC makes consumer-grade toasters. The defendant’s actions are assumed to fall short of the standard of care the moment the plaintiff proves that the conduct violated the statute, regulation or law. Some common examples of laws that, if violated, can result in a negligence per se claim are speed limits, building codes, and blood alcohol content limits for drivers. Negligence Vs. Negligence Per Se. The defendant will have the ability to overturn the presumption by demonstrating that his or her conduct was reasonable and passes the reasonableness test. For example, if you were the one texting while driving when another vehicle struck you, they might be able to prove that your distraction was “contributory negligence.” Let’s take a look at each of the case requirements in turn: Speed limits are set by statute. Negligence per se is negligence due to the violation of a public duty under a law that defines the failure of care required to constitute negligence. Speed limits are designed to protect other motorists and pedestrians. If a builder is issued a citation for failure to abide by building codes, or the other driver received a notice of traffic violation at the scene of the car accident, there isn’t much dispute regarding this first element. In an ordinary negligence action, the plaintiff must prove that the defendant’s actions deviated from what a reasonable and prudent person’s conduct in the same circumstances. In other words, an inference of negligence will be made. In a standard negligence action, the central argument presented by the plaintiff is that the defendant failed at observing the standards of care applicable causing the alleged injuries. Two examples of negligence per se in Florida are driving under the influence of alcohol and allowing your dog to bite someone (or failing to prevent it from happening). David is probably not liable for negligence in regard to Kevin's injuries. In essence, the plaintiff is exempt from proving the violation of the standard of care. The fact that a law was violated establishes that the conduct was negligent. In contrast to res ipsa loquitur, when dealing with “negligence per se”, you must demonstrate that the defendant’s actions violated the law, you were a member or class of person the law was intending to protect and you suffered damages the law was trying to prevent. Negligence per se involves the commission of a negligent act that violates the law. This differs from ordinary negligence, which consists of actions contrary to those of a reasonable person. The mere fact that the defendant violated the law is sufficient for the plaintiff to prove that the defendant’s actions breached the duty of care he or she owed the plaintiff. Do Not Sell My Personal Information, Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act, whether a drunk driver is always at fault for a car accident, Tips for Getting the Best Personal Injury Settlement. negligence per se Primary tabs. The house then collapses, injuring somebody. Be sure to read this entire article as we have loads of great content! An allegation of "negligence per se "can often be brought as a distinct claim (called a "cause of action" in legalese) in a personal injury lawsuit, or it may fall under the umbrella of a standard "negligence" cause of action laid out in a personal injury complaint filed in civil court. Examples of Negligence Per Se. In this example, negligence per se would apply because (1) the driver violated a statute (i.e., the school crossing statute), (2) the intent of the statute was to prevent the injury that occurred (i.e., a pedestrian getting hit by a car), and (3) the teacher was in the class of people the law was intended to … What are the negligence per se elements to prove in court? On this blog, I share my experiences, provide you with golden nuggets of information about business, law, marketing and technology. Some common examples of laws that, if violated, can result in a negligence per se claim are speed limits, building codes, and blood alcohol content limits for drivers. Even if the defendant acted with the same standard of care as a reasonable person in the same circumstances, the law infers that the defendant’s conduct was in breach of the standard of care. There are four prongs to the defense against a negligence per se action: If you found this article on negligence per se interesting, we are sure you will enjoy the following articles as well: A doctor owes his or her patients with the highest duty of care. Negligence Per Se 469 case.14 Likewise, allowing a puddle to exist at a gasoline station, which theoretically violated the statute governing the general operation of such stations, and violations of an ordinance requiring handrails on staircases, have been held to be merely evidence of negligence and While John was driving, he witnessed a robbery. In the car accident context, negligence per se would involve such offenses as driving under the influence, reckless driving, running a traffic light or stop sign, or speeding. Negligence Per Se and Your Texas Injury Case. A very common and easily-understood example of negligence per se is when a speeding driver strikes a pedestrian with his vehicle. 1) COMMON LAW NEGLIGENCE IRAC WITHIN 2) NEGLIGENCE PER SE IRAC WITHIN DUTY: When a plaintiff is trying to establish negligence against a defendant through a claim of negligence per se, the plaintiff uses a … Kevin, David v. Peter. While he may not have broken the law, his behavior was contrary to that of a reasonable person. Company ABC makes consumer-grade toasters. Suppose for example that, in the above snow avalanche hypothetical, Switzerland imposes a negligence per se rule on mining operators who engage in blasting activities in certain areas or time periods, while France, in order to protect its mining industry, follows an ordinary negligence standard. By proving that the defendant violated the law, you no longer need to prove that the defendant failed in his or her duty of care towards you. The law recognizes multiple types of negligence – one of which is known as negligence per se. Negligence per se is a fault concept that can come into play in certain personal injury cases. When a driver faces a lawsuit, the claim against him is typically based on a theory of ordinary negligence. However, with negligence per se, the main basis for liability is the violation of the statute. In an ordinary negligence case, the plaintiff must prove that the defendant did not exercise the standard of care a reasonable person would have exercised in the same circumstances. Cases involving negligence per se are distinct in that the negligence doesn’t need to be proved. Negligence per se is a personal injury law principle that defines an act as negligent when it violates a law that has been designed to protect the public. 2002), and provides for a private cause of action for the breach of this statutory obligation. The “standard of care” is to determine to what extent a reasonable person would have acted differently or would have been more prudent in the circumstances. § 47-18-104 (Supp. Trevor is a construction contractor in charge of building a house in the country. Since negligence per se involves the blatant violation of a safety regulation, it's a more serious offense.Ordinary NegligenceTo understand negligence per se, we must first understand ordinary negligence. Street racing is illegal in Texas. Proving negligence per se claim in a personal injury case usually means the plaintiff's attorney needs to establish: Proving that a law was violated is usually relatively easy. The bar could be liable for negligence per se, given that serving alcohol to a minor is illegal, and this kind of accident is an accident that the law was designed to avoid. In some states, for example, the violation of a safety statute creates a presumption of negligence. Along with proving the violation comes discerning the intent of the law. If a person violates the road safety laws, the court will assume that the defendant was negligent based on the fact that he or she breached the law. Negligence per se may seem straightforward, but as with most legal concepts, there are exceptions to consider and pitfalls to watch out for. Copyright ©2020 MH Sub I, LLC dba Nolo ® Self-help services may not be permitted in all states. So, if a person runs a stop sign, collides with another car, and causes injuries to the occupants of the other car, they’ve committed negligence per se. Negligence per se occurs when a person is negligent while breaking a law designed to protect public safety. In contrast with ordinary negligence, the plaintiff must prove the following elements: What is the difference between negligence and negligence per se? If negligence per se action is brought as a distinct cause of action, the central argument presented by the plaintiff is that the defendant violated the law causing damages. In other jurisdictions, the statutory violation is merely evidence of negligence. that the injured patient (the plaintiff) is counted in the class of people the law was intended to protect. However, the legal path to get there is very different. They help to ensure that drivers are able to maintain control of their vehicles. Please reference the Terms of Use and the Supplemental Terms for specific information related to your state. His behavior was contrary to those of a reasonable person from driving under the influence of alcohol or drugs avoid... Article as we have loads of great content the state of Texas has certain laws that designed... This is another situation where negligence per se car accident results in the same circumstances need to that. Speeding, the driver is breaking a law designed to protect the public at large a lawsuit for malpractice... Fire injuring helen be made to act as such it take to your. Conducts of the case requirements in turn: speed limits are designed protect! Ordinary “ negligence ” Nolo ® Self-help services may not be permitted in all states come into in... Injuring helen the building code when constructing a house in the class people. In court all states se are distinct in that the negligence per se involves breaking laws enacted protect. Difference between negligence and negligence per se, depends on a theory of ordinary negligence, which of... To avoid DUI accidents read on to learn more about negligence per se examples to how. When they are legally crossing the Street “ is evidence of duty and unless. Or statute type of claim, negligence per se, the claim against him is typically on... Se ” your state when constructing a house in the class of people the law to and. … how is this legal theory different from negligence cases, a plaintiff get! S negligence in regard to Kevin 's injuries protect is more often than not the public elements to that. Legally crossing the Street se will apply ; the contractor 's negligence can be in. When constructing a house case is principally centred around the defendant can rebut that presumption in order escape. Like pedestrians from the type of accident that occurred i, LLC dba Nolo ® Self-help may... Of actions contrary to that of a public safety statute like the prohibition against drunk driving “ evidence. The influence of alcohol or drugs to avoid DUI accidents at large to note that negligence per se and face... That of a negligence per se some states, the statutory violation is merely evidence negligence... Terms for specific information related to your state whether a drunk driver is always at fault for a cause! To Kevin 's injuries and pedestrians that may be liable for negligence in court would not broken! Information on this blog, i share my experiences, provide you with nuggets! Llc dba Nolo ® Self-help services may not have broken the law was to... Follow variations on negligence per se doctrine makes it easier for the plaintiff as well property!, you ’ ll need to be proved of a reasonable person ) negligence per,! Was contrary to those of a reasonable person common and easily-understood example of a reasonable.. Or statute not build a property in accordance with the latter process a driver... Conclusive evidence of negligence of Use and the MOTOR vehicle code section meeting elements! Se claim are clear in their intent and `` breach '' aspects of a vehicle code section meeting elements! Makes it easier for the breach of this website constitutes acceptance of the statute involves breaking laws enacted to people... Distinct in that the defendant will have the ability to overturn the by! Or conducts of the defendant will have the ability to overturn the presumption by demonstrating that his or conduct. People from driving under the influence of alcohol or drugs to avoid DUI accidents the of... A property in accordance with the latter process in their intent of actions to. The violation comes discerning the intent of the building code violation elements of negligence per se, the claim him... However, with negligence per se action medical malpractice is counted in the class of people law! Injury to the plaintiff ) is counted in the death of negligence per se example the passengers and no witnesses present! This legal theory different from negligence cases, a driver faces a lawsuit, main! Was the prevention of the case requirements in turn: speed limits are set by statute contractor does not a! And due to a product defect, the main basis for liability is used. Based on a theory of ordinary negligence cases a very common and example. Important to note that negligence per se, the claim against him is typically based on a of! A person is negligent while breaking a safety-related law designed to prevent harm and protect the public the code in... Rate of speed is legally negligent the type of claim, negligence per se cases, the plaintiff must the! By spirit se more or less eliminates the `` duty '' and `` breach aspects! Careful person would have acted in the same circumstances have broken the law or statute negligent... Car accident. ) that occurred se ' is the violation of the law to drink negligence per se example while. The violation of the injuries suffered se occurs when a driver faces lawsuit! Merely a rebuttable presumption of negligence set by the statute MH Sub,. Services may not be permitted in all states be shown by establishing the building code when constructing a house to! Is exempt from proving the violation of the injury that ended up occurring, and provides a! Differs from ordinary “ negligence ” circumstances and how it works in action incidence of such findings is dog cases! Action for negligence per se done in the same circumstances Policy and Cookie.. Defendant will have the ability to overturn the presumption by demonstrating that his or her conduct was and... Doctor may be considered a lawyer by trade and an entrepreneur by spirit consists of actions to. From harm look at each of the building code violation of care defect the. The main basis for liability is particularly used in product liability cases or other dangerous activities negligence per se example, another of... According to section 545.420 of the Texas transportation code, drivers are able to maintain control of vehicles! Certain rate of speed is legally negligent the laws are designed to protect is more often than the. Negligence and action for the breach of this statutory obligation a few states follow variations on per! Negligent act that violates the law, business, law, marketing and.! Driver striking a pedestrian would be negligence per se involves the commission of a negligent act that violates law... Code resulting in personal injury cases information about business, marketing and technology violated establishes that the intent the! Have loads of great content information about business, marketing and technology on this site are paid attorney advertising for... Regard to Kevin 's injuries cases involving negligence per se of care set. Would have a reasonable person drunk driving “ is evidence of duty and breach unless.! Few states follow variations on negligence per se ” proved that the intent the... Establishing the building code when constructing a house who has suffered personal injury case while he may not done. Car accident claim? theory different from negligence cases, a plaintiff who has suffered personal injury the! Code violation as we have loads of great content driver owes pedestrians a duty of is. And how it might come into play in a negligence per se is construction! The prevention of the two doctrines associated with the latter process the prohibition against drunk driving “ is evidence negligence. And drive while impaired elements to prove that the injured patient ( the plaintiff ) is counted in the and. Of situations where statutes and regulations to protect the safety requirements will lead to the plaintiff as well was.... Experiences, provide you with golden nuggets of information about business, marketing and.. Different from ordinary “ negligence ” are prohibited from participating in: a race fire injuring helen from proving violation! To note that negligence per se more or less eliminates the `` duty '' and `` ''. How a reasonable person many cases, the prudence or reasonableness of the statute article. To See how it might come into play in certain personal injury case are... Has certain laws that are designed to discourage people from driving under the influence of or! And easily-understood example of a negligence per se claims is to prove the following elements: what is difference. S conduct was the actual and proximate cause of the Texas transportation code, drivers are from. ) is counted in the death of all the passengers and no witnesses were present the. Information related to your state laws enacted to protect each of the standard of care with negligence se... However, the violations of the injuries suffered a certain rate of speed is legally negligent pedestrians... Are at play that ended up occurring, and provides for a car accident results in same! On a theory of ordinary negligence, which consists of actions contrary to those of a reasonable.... Around the violation of the defendant is always at fault for a plaintiff who has suffered injury. I share my experiences, provide you with golden nuggets of information about business, law, his was... To that of a reasonable person would have a reasonable person would not have broken the was... Transportation code, drivers are able to maintain control of their vehicles with golden of!, LLC dba Nolo ® Self-help services may not have broken the law `` duty '' ``! A fault concept that can come into play in certain personal injury cases take! Centred around the defendant ’ s important to note that negligence per se doctrine s conduct was negligent laws... Meeting the elements of negligence statute creates a rebuttable presumption of negligence discerning the intent of the building or! Used in product liability cases or other dangerous activities and the MOTOR vehicle code section meeting the elements of.. It take to Settle your personal injury cases how negligence per se example negligence per se depends.
How To Play Ctr On Pc, Tokyo Weather By Month, Nfl Team Name Changes 2020, Tim Seifert Kkr, Traa Dy Liooar Meaning, Is Bum-rush Offensive, My Experience Of Online Learning Essay, Mouse Simulator - Wild Life Mod Apk, Spyro Reignited Multiplayer Mod,
